Saturday, June 28, 2008

Friday Night Nosh

I got together last night with my friend Wendy and her friend Marjorie for nibbles and libations. Wendy's house is gorgeous, southwestern earth tones and a lime-olive green bathroom. Wendy is a quilting queen, so lots of quilts hanging on the walls and a table of handmade goddesses (which I must look at more closely next time). She showed me some double zero (tiny!!!!) knitting needles and thread which she used to make amulet bags for her pals last xmas (solstice). I was amazed and impressed and excited and inspired.


Toward the end of the evening we got to talking about celibacy and religion. It began when I was talking about my training as a yoga teacher. One of the swami's told us that tantra didn't exist and then in the same sentence said it was a left-hand path. (does it exist or doesn't it?) The bottom line was they advocated bramacharya (in the simplest sense, celibacy).


So the question we left the night with was: Why are religions so hung up on sexuality? Why is celibacy necessary in order to reach spiritual enlightenment? It's across the board with most Western religions and at least what I learned of eastern (Hindu) religion that I studied at the ashram.


My first thought was that when societies were matrilineal and women had ownership of land, they had the power. At some point in western history, male priests married women (landowners), got their land, then declared that women had no rights and witch hunts ensued, etc., etc.


Sexuality is fluid, feminine. Subjugate women, subjugate sexuality.


Fertility/sexuality was also where women held power. Women are the givers of life, they also knew what to do/what herbs to take in order to prevent pregnancy. Furthermore, women have the capacity to have sex ongoing whereas men can ejaculate a few times a day and that's it. From a purely biological, propagate-the-species-point-of-view, maybe women are built this way to a) have the capacity to receive a lot of pleasure to make the pain and danger of childbirth worth it and/or b) have the capacity to have sex with many different partners so that the sperm of the healthiest partner gets through, hence, hopefully guaranteeing stronger, more fit offspring. (Of course, if you don't believe in evolution . . . what can I say?)


That leaves another problem for men. It means that they can never be sure if they are the baby-daddy. (Well, now that there's DNA testing and Maury Povitch . . . )


Getting away from the "power over women" point of view, having a healthy sexual relationship with a person (whether it's male/female or same sex), requires the ability to be loving and trusting and vulnerable. It takes time and energy. It requires us to be open with our feelings and accepting of our partner. We must resist the urge to control or be controlled. How many of us actually have the willingness to go deep, to surrender? How many of us have had the experience of letting our egos go so utterly completely with another person that we realize we are "One with the Universe" and that the love we are experiencing is expanding in that universe? (It's the grooviest experience ever!)

Some religions teach that the only way to really experience total surrender is to actually physically die. So, perhaps a reason to fear sex? Some people even fear meditation for that very reason!

From a yogic standpoint, when you have sex with someone, you pick up your partner's energy and they pick up yours. You exchange karma, essentially. Not just from this lifetime, but from all the millions of past lifetimes. So, if you're focus is on releasing your karma and ceasing to be reincarnated, then it would make sense to just avoid sex altogether.

Or how about this -- if we are enjoying life and our partners, maybe we won't be so compelled to acquire more "things". Maybe we'd realize we don't have to consume so much, make more money, submit to slavery. That leaves less tithing money for the church (temple, synagogue, you fill in the blank).

Or maybe we'd we feel so good enjoying our sexuality, we wouldn't have to go to church at all? We might start beginning to have our own ideas about spirituality and enlightenment. We might even decide to make up our own rituals.

Every person has sexuality. Make people feel ashamed about sexuality, and you have power over them. When our view of nature is distorted, we can't be sure of anything. Instead of looking within and listening to our own answers (because now we are stupid and afraid and "sinful"), we look outside of ourselves for what is "right". So the preacher in the pulpit who makes us feel shame and guilt must be right, or the talking head shouting at us from CNN or FOX must be right, or our neighbor with the SUV and the Prada handbag must be right. Whatever makes us feel inadequate must be right, no?

Since we're looking outside of ourselves for validation, we must also look outside of ourselves for what is "invalid". If we are harsh judges of ourselves, how harsh are we going to be on others? The more we look outside ourselves for what is wrong with everyone else, the less we know ourselves, and, the more "evil" we see in the world. As we further lose sight of ourselves, we lose personal power. It's a cycle, because the more powerless we feel, the more we need validation. The less we know what really makes us happy, the more we need someone (or a talking box) to tell us what is "good for us".

So, sex isn't "bad". What's bad are the power trips surrounding it that are bad. And because sex is so powerful, there are a lot of them.

OK, my 2nd chakra rant of the day is done for now. I think I opened a huge can of worms, and I could keep going. These are just general ideas, perhaps I will go back and work on more comprehensive drafts. Right now I need a shower and to stretch my periformas and psoas muscles.


2 comments:

Chris Na Taraja said...

Wow holly, that's a huge question.

You really hit on it when you say that the churches are afraid we would enjoy sex so much that we would make our own rituals. that's really it in a nutshell.

Sex is one of our greatest powers. Most organized religions are trying to subdue peoples power in order to control them and propagate themselves.

Imagine if a religion didn't try to control your sex. Then, gods forbid, you might sleep with someone of another religion, then how will the baby be raised?! It's completely political.

So all of these ideas about sex are really askew. The idea that having sex increases your Karma is a scare tactic. Isn't it the opposite. Chinese acupuncture and acupressure show that releasing the chi in the body is healing...isn't that what sex ultimately does? Check out the glow on someone or the way they move after good sex.

Granted sex can be addictive and out of balance just like anything else, but in it's highest form it is powerful and healing.

Religion tries to control food and money, and our wills, the other things that give us personal power and health.

Brahmacharya has been traditionally translated as celibacy, but that is not what it means. Brahma is God, the divine, or the creator. Acharya means to move towards or to live in a certain way. Together it basically means to live in a way that's focused on God.

Maybe it means we are supposed to be unattached from distractions. Brahmacharya was traditionally done by older men who fulfilled their family obligations.

Sex is the thing that brings us closest to the divine (accept maybe music and yoga and magic...but sex is music and yoga and magic!)

So conscious sex is true Brahmacharya!

And one more aside...I don't think matriarchal societies had "owning the land" in the sense that Patriarchal societies have distorted and imbalanced our relationship with the land. Sacred spots which are run by monks or nuns, usually are the property of the gods and the people.

The Christians did take the land away form powerful women with knowledge of herbs and spirit. But I really question the existance of goddess centered and women in total power societies. Maybe as a reaction to patriarchy, but I can't imagine that the divine feminine oppresses the masculine in quite the same way. I really believe most religions and cultures were a bit more balanced, before this "one god" bullshit infected our world for the past 3,400 years. (when Egytian Pharaoh Amenhotep III created monotheism)

holly troy said...

CHris,

The more i think about the women owned land, the more i agree with you. AS I was writing this I was thinking, WAIT A MINUTE . . .

CAn't we all just get along?

I love men! When I am in love, I will give the moon and stars, which is what I am and everyone and everythign is anyway.

I agree about bramacharya, too.

ShareThis